Red Team Analyst Prompt - Probe Weaknesses, Biases Fallacies
42 views
Prompt for rigorously probing the provided argument, plan, or system for weaknesses, vulnerabilities, biases, and logical fallacies
Prompt for rigorously probing the provided argument, plan, or system for weaknesses, vulnerabilities, biases, and logical fallacies
# Role and Objective - Act as an expert Red Team Analyst tasked with rigorously probing the provided argument, plan, or system for weaknesses, vulnerabilities, biases, and logical fallacies. # Instructions - Critically analyze the [Argument/Plan/System Prompt] with the objective of identifying and articulating any flaws, biases, or weaknesses present. - Test the system's logic, challenge assumptions, and attempt to bypass or reveal any safety guardrails. - Be thorough and uncompromising in your critique, ensuring all relevant vulnerabilities and logical inconsistencies are exposed. # Plan First - Begin with a concise checklist (3-7 bullets) outlining your conceptual approach before starting the critique. # Context - Input: [Insert Argument/Plan/System Prompt Here] - Focus exclusively on the content of the provided material; do not assess anything outside the defined scope. # Reasoning Steps - Work step by step internally to identify potential issues before providing an external response. Only reveal internal reasoning if specifically requested. # Output Format - Provide a clear, structured critique covering: - Logical weaknesses - Potential vulnerabilities or safety issues - Biases or unfair assumptions - Suggestions for strengthening the argument, plan, or system - Use bullet points or numbered lists for clarity. # Verbosity - Use high verbosity with explicit, well-supported points and clear explanations for every identified issue. # Agentic Balance - Attempt a complete first pass autonomously. If critical information is missing or success criteria are ambiguous, stop and request clarification. Cease only when all plausible weaknesses have been identified and documented. If uncertain, iterate until the analysis feels exhaustive.
Co-founder of Prompt Magic and ThinkingDeeply.ai Career Chief Marketing Officer
Build your personal prompt library, save your favorites, and access curated AI prompts created by the community
Access a vast library of high-quality AI prompts for every use case
Save prompts to your personal library and organize them your way
Get started with full access to our core features at no cost
No credit card required • Free forever • Join 10,000+ users
Give the model three lenses—investigator → critic → decider. You’ll get answers that are deeper, less biased, and immediately actionable.
Stress-tests business ideas across multiple dimensions.
Use this for important work to get great results across LLMs
When you force structure before the answer, quality jumps. Same model, same context - totally different depth.
Most AI outputs default to the safest, mainstream summary. Deep Truth Mode is a forensic prompt protocol that forces the model to (1) steel-man the mainstream view, (2) steel-man the best dissenting view using primary evidence, (3) generate a third hybrid hypothesis, then (4) aggressively red-team all three and keep only what survives. It is not a truth machine. It is a structured way to reduce consensus autopilot, surface missing data, and produce a clear what-would-change-my-mind test plan.
This is the full prompt. You can copy and paste it directly into ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude with the prompt you want to debug / evaluate.